Sparrow v. Goodman
District Court, W.D. North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
McMILLAN, District Judge.
1. This matter was heard on May 29, 1974, on the “Rule 12 Motion to Dismiss” filed by Defendants Haldeman, Walker and Henkel on November 12, 1973, which raises the defenses of (1) lack of jurisdiction over the subject matter, (2) failure to state a claim, (3) insufficiency of service of process, and (4) lack of jurisdiction over the person.
2. The motions to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction over the subject matter and for failure to state a claim are denied. Sparrow v. Goodman, 361 F.Supp. 566 (W.D.N.C., 1973).
3. The motion to dismiss for insufficiency of service…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Monroe v. PapeSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- McGee v. International Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Arthur H. Aftanase v. Economy Baler Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1965
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Dillon v. Numismatic Funding Corp.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1977
- Gemini Enterprises, Inc. v. WFMY Television Corp.District Court, M.D. North Carolina · 1979
- Phoenix America Corp. v. BrisseyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980
- Occidental Fire & Casualty Co. v. Continental Illinois National Bank & Trust Co.District Court, E.D. North Carolina · 1988
- In the Interest of HewittSupreme Court of Iowa · 1978
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.