Canal-Randolph Anaheim, Inc. v. JE WILKOSKI
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
TAMURA, Acting P. J.
This is an appeal from a judgment denying a claim of exemption and adjudicating several third party claims to office equipment, furnishings and law books of J. E. Wilkoski, a law corporation, which were subject to a levy under a writ of execution on a judgment against the law corporation. The principal issue, which appears to be one of first impression, is whether a law corporation is entitled to the benefit of the exemption provided by Code of Civil Procedure section 690.4.
The record on appeal consists only of the judgment roll and a limited engrossed settled…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Moyer v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
- Nestle v. City of Santa MonicaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
- Stevens v. Parke, Davis & Co.California Supreme Court · 1973
- In Re Marriage of MixCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
- Panopulos v. MaderisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Crouse v. Brobeck, Phleger & HarrisonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
- Star Pacific Investments, Inc. v. Oro Hills Ranch, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1981
- Meyer v. Byron Jackson, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1984
- International Canning Machinery, Ltd. v. Murrieta Hot Springs (In re Murrieta Hot Springs)United States Bankruptcy Court, C.D. California · 1980
- California Coastal Commission v. AllenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.