Naisbitt v. Hodges
Utah Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
McDONOUGH, Chief Justice.
Defendants appeal from a decree of the ■district court whereby a deed was reformed in accordance with the contention of the plaintiff. The trial court also adjudged that plaintiff had acquired title to the disputed tract by adverse possession.
From a review of both the record and the findings of the lower court, the facts are as follows:
In February, 1916, the defendant, Parley N. Hodges, secured from the United States Government a patent to Lot Five, Section Thirty-three, Township 14 North of Range 5 East, Salt Lake Meridian, containing 16.51 acres. Bear Lake abutted…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Sine v. HarperUtah Supreme Court · 1950
- Peterson v. PaulsonWashington Supreme Court · 1945
- Weight v. BaileyUtah Supreme Court · 1915
- Ewing v. KeithUtah Supreme Court · 1898
- Deseret National Bank v. DinwoodeyUtah Supreme Court · 1898
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Shrum v. ZeltwangerWyoming Supreme Court · 1977
- RHN CORP. v. VeibellUtah Supreme Court · 2004
- DOXEY-LAYTON COMPANY v. ClarkUtah Supreme Court · 1976
- Pfister v. BrownWyoming Supreme Court · 1972
- Federal Deposit Insurance Corp.v. TaylorCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2011
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.