Legal Opinion

Naisbitt v. Hodges

Utah Supreme Court

Decided February 25, 1957No. 8531PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McDONOUGH, Chief Justice.

Defendants appeal from a decree of the ■district court whereby a deed was reformed in accordance with the contention of the plaintiff. The trial court also adjudged that plaintiff had acquired title to the disputed tract by adverse possession.

From a review of both the record and the findings of the lower court, the facts are as follows:

In February, 1916, the defendant, Parley N. Hodges, secured from the United States Government a patent to Lot Five, Section Thirty-three, Township 14 North of Range 5 East, Salt Lake Meridian, containing 16.51 acres. Bear Lake abutted…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Sine v. HarperUtah Supreme Court · 1950
  2. Peterson v. PaulsonWashington Supreme Court · 1945
  3. Weight v. BaileyUtah Supreme Court · 1915
  4. Ewing v. KeithUtah Supreme Court · 1898
  5. Deseret National Bank v. DinwoodeyUtah Supreme Court · 1898

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Shrum v. ZeltwangerWyoming Supreme Court · 1977
  2. RHN CORP. v. VeibellUtah Supreme Court · 2004
  3. DOXEY-LAYTON COMPANY v. ClarkUtah Supreme Court · 1976
  4. Pfister v. BrownWyoming Supreme Court · 1972
  5. Federal Deposit Insurance Corp.v. TaylorCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2011

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API