Prudential Property & Casualty Insurance. Co. v. Mardanlou
Utah Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
WILKINS, Justice:
This is an action by plaintiff for declaratory relief pursuant to § 78-33-1, et seq., Utah Code Annotated, 1953, seeking to render void and have rescinded a renter’s (homeowner’s) policy because of material misrepresentations made by the defendant when applying for said insurance. After a non-jury trial, the District Court of Salt Lake County determined that the policy of insurance was void, rescinded the policy, and entered a judgment providing that plaintiff was relieved from any further obligation to the defendant, who appealed. Affirmed. Costs to plaintiff.
The facts here…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Bearden v. Countryside Casualty CompanyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1961
- Robinson v. National Automobile & Casualty InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
- Moore v. Prudential Insurance Company of AmericaUtah Supreme Court · 1971
- Burnham v. Bankers Life & Casualty CompanyUtah Supreme Court · 1970
- Violin v. Fireman's Fund InsuranceNevada Supreme Court · 1965
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Berger v. Minnesota Mutual Life Insurance Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1986
- Golden Rule Insurance v. HughesDistrict Court, D. Utah · 1992