Legal Opinion

Wilson v. Johnson

Court of Appeals of Utah

Decided May 20, 2010No. 20090193-CAPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*1158OPINION

McHUGH, Associate Presiding Judge:

T1 Angela Johnson challenges the trial court's grant of summary judgment in favor of Seott and Tiffany Wilson. Johnson contends that summary judgment was inappropriate because the seller financing addendum (SFA-1) to the Real Estate Purchase Contract (the REPC) was not binding upon her. Johnson alternatively argues that even if SFA-1 is enforceable, she was excused from performance because the Wilsons materially breached the contract by failing to tender $160,000 in cash and by failing to execute and deliver a promissory note and trust deed consistent…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Daines v. VincentUtah Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Giusti v. Sterling Wentworth Corp.Utah Supreme Court · 2009
  3. R.T. Nielson Co. v. CookUtah Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Tangren Family Trust v. Tangren Ex Rel. TangrenUtah Supreme Court · 2008
  5. Golden Key Realty, Inc. v. MantasUtah Supreme Court · 1985

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. ACC Capital Corporation v. Ace West FoamCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2018
  2. Geonan Properties, LLC v. Park-Ro-She, Inc.Court of Appeals of Utah · 2011
  3. Blosch v. Natixis Real Estate Capital, Inc.Court of Appeals of Utah · 2013
  4. BMBT, LLC v. MillerCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2014
  5. Wilson v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API