Legal Opinion

Best v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided April 28, 1988No. 722-85CPublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

MOODY R. TIDWELL, III, Judge:

Plaintiffs in this action, aircraft mechanics and other technicians now or formerly employed at a United States Army Reserve Aviation Support Facility, seek review of wage setting practices and procedures, increase in salaries, back pay, and declaratory and mandamus relief. The case is presently before the court on defendant’s motion for summary judgment.

FACTS

A. Wage Schedule Procedure

Prior to 1968, no federal regulatory scheme existed to equalize pay scales of blue collar workers employed by different federal agencies in any given geographical area. As a…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
  3. United States v. KingSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  4. Housing Corp. of America v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1972
  5. Kirby v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1973

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Arakaki v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2004
  2. Bevevino v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2009
  3. Archer v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1989
  4. Hart v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1989
  5. AGP, L.P. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1998

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API