Legal Opinion
Archer v. United States
United States Court of Claims
Decided October 5, 1989No. 166-85CPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
RADER, Judge.
Plaintiffs, twenty individual employees of the Bureau of Engraving and Printing (Bureau), Department of the Treasury *604(Treasury), originally brought this action in the United States District Court for the District of Columbia through their union, the Bank Note Engravers Guild. Plaintiffs claimed that the Bureau unreasonably denied pay increases from 1979 to 1984. On March 26, 1985, the district court transferred this action to the United States Claims Court. Plaintiffs allege that the Director of the Bureau did not fully implement pay raises and exercise pay-fixing…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Barmag Barmer Maschinenfabrik Ag v. Murata MacHinery Ltd., and Murata of America, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
- Amell v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Susan Alaniz, Appellants/cross-Appellees v. Office of Personnel Management, Appellees/cross-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
- Blaha v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1975
- Daniel Bradley v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1989
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Ainslie v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2003
- Bradley v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1992
- U.S. Department of the Treasury, Bureau of Engraving & Printing v. Federal Labor Relations AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1993
- U.S. Department Of The Treasury v. Federal Labor Relations AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1993