AGP, L.P. v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
REGINALD W. GIBSON, Senior Judge.
INTRODUCTION
Plaintiffs, AGP, L.P., et al., filed a claim in this court challenging the constitutionality of the Harbor Maintenance Tax (HMT) on exports and seeking a refund of payments made under the HMT. Subsequent to the filing of this claim, however, the United States Supreme Court has held that the Court of International Trade (CIT) has exclusive jurisdiction over challenges to the HMT. This circumstance, of course, divests the Court of Federal Claims (COFC) of jurisdiction to hear such challenges. United States v. United States Shoe Corp., — U.S.…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- United States v. United States Shoe Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1998
- United States Shoe Corporation v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1997
- Cavin v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1989
- Best v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1988
3Cited by3 opinions
- Edelmann v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2007
- Leffebre v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2016
- Jackson v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2022