Legal Opinion
Lucerne Farms v. Baling Technologies, Inc.
District Court, D. Maine
Decided July 1, 2002No. 02-CV-49-B-SPublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
AMENDED ORDER
SINGAL, District Judge.
A producer of animal feed seeks contract and tort damages from the seller of a reconditioned baling machine that the buyer claims was defective. Presently before the Court are Plaintiffs Motion for Default Judgment (Docket # 2) and Defendant’s Motion to Set Aside Default and for Leave to File a Late Answer (Docket # 3). For the following reasons, the Court DENIES Plaintiffs Motion and GRANTS Defendant’s Motion.
I. BACKGROUND
Plaintiff Lucerne Farms claims that a reconditioned baling machine it bought from Defendant Baling Technologies, Inc. (“BTI”) in early…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Scott Coon v. Robert P. GrenierCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1989
- Lorfano v. Dura Stone Steps, Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1990
- Ruth Leshore, Etc. v. County of WorcesterCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1991
- Snyder v. TalbotDistrict Court, D. Maine · 1993
- Telford Aviation, Inc. v. Raycom National, Inc.District Court, D. Maine · 2000
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Lucerne Farms v. Baling Technologies, Inc.District Court, D. Maine · 2002
- Shaw v. 500516 N.B. Ltd.District Court, D. Maine · 2009
- BROWDY v. CENTRAL MAINE POWER COMPANYDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2023
- DAVIS v. THERIAULTDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2024
- McGarey v. York CountyDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2006
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.