Legal Opinion

BROWDY v. CENTRAL MAINE POWER COMPANY

District Court, D. Maine

Decided March 15, 2023No. 2:22-cv-00384Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES D ISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MAINE SHAWN W. BROWDY, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) 2:22-cv-00384-JDL ) CENTRAL MAINE POWER ) COMPANY, et al., ) ) Defendants. ) ORDER ON PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT AND MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT Plaintiff Shawn W. Browdy, proceeding pro se, commenced this action on December 6, 2022, against the Central Maine Power Company (“CMP”), the Maine Public Utilities Commission (“MPUC”), David Caron, and Mitchell Tannenbaum (ECF No. 1). Browdy simultaneously filed a Motion for a Temporary Restraining Order pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Juan R. Ortiz-Gonzalez v. Fonovisa, Juan R. Ortiz-Gonzalez v. Distribuidora Nacional De Discos, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2002
  2. Niemic v. MaloneyDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2005
  3. Lucerne Farms v. Baling Technologies, Inc.District Court, D. Maine · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API