Legal Opinion

Lorfano v. Dura Stone Steps, Inc.

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided January 29, 1990PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WATHEN, Justice.

Plaintiffs Gary and Jo-Ann Lorfano appeal from an order of the Superior Court (Cumberland County, Alexander, J.) granting summary judgment in favor of defen dant Dura Stone Steps, Inc. (Dura Stone). 1 Although plaintiffs do not challenge the judgment entered on their negligence claim, they contend on appeal that Dayton was not entitled to judgment as a matter of law on their claims of strict liability and breach of warranties. We disagree and affirm judgment.

The facts developed at the motion hearing may be summarized as follows: Plaintiff Gary Lorfano’s employer maintained an…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Canifax v. Hercules Powder Co.California Court of Appeal · 1965
  2. Inman v. Binghamton Housing AuthorityNew York Court of Appeals · 1957
  3. Bernier v. Raymark Industries, Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1986
  4. prod.liab.rep.(cch)p 10,662 Michael Plante v. Hobart Corporation and the R.M. Flagg CompanyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1985
  5. Carlson v. HamplSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1969

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Glittenberg v. Doughboy Recreational IndustriesMichigan Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Russell Violette v. Smith & Nephew Dyonics, Inc., Russell Violette v. Smith & Nephew Dyonics, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1995
  3. Guiggey v. BombardierSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1992
  4. Koken v. Black & Veatch Construction, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2005
  5. Starr Surplus Lines Ins. Co. v. Mountaire Farms Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2019

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API