Legal Opinion
Lucerne Farms v. Baling Technologies, Inc.
District Court, D. Maine
Decided October 23, 2002No. 1:02-cv-00049PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
SINGAL, District Judge.
A producer of animal feed seeks contract and tort damages from the seller of a reconditioned baling machine that the buyer claims was defective. Presently before the Court is Defendant’s motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction. (Docket # 16). For the following reasons, the Court DENIES Defendant’s motion.
I. LEGAL STANDARD
When a district court rules on a motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction without holding an evidentiary hearing, the plaintiff bears the burden of making a prima facie showing of personal jurisdiction over the defendant.…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Helicopteros Nacionales De Colombia, S. A. v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Massachusetts School of Law at Andover, Inc. v. American Bar Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1998
- Richard A. Daynard v. Ness, Motley, Loadholt, Richardson & Poole, P.A. Ronald L. Motley, Scruggs, Millette, Bozeman & Dent P.A. Richard F. ScruggsCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2002
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Henderson v. Laser Spine Institute LLCDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2011
- Reed & Reed, Inc. v. George R. Cairns & Sons, Inc.District Court, D. Maine · 2007
- FRANCHINI v. GANNETT COMPANY INCDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2019
- P.C. Hoag v. Man Lift Mfg. Co., et al.District Court, D. New Hampshire · 2016
- SPERZEL v. CHEMBIO DIAGNOSTICS INCDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2021
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.