Legal Opinion

Cherry v. Thomasson

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided July 9, 1981No. 21517PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Harwell, Justice:

Broadus L. Thomasson appeals the decision of the trial judge which makes him accountable to his partner, respondent, W. P. Cherry, Jr., for partnership losses and for certain benefits he received out of the partnership. We affirm but modify as to> one item of account.

This action was one in equity tried by the judge without a reference. We will accordingly find facts as we determine them to exist by a preponderance of the evidence. Brown v. State Farm Mutual Insurance Company, S. C., 269 S. E. (2d) 769 (1980). This does not require us to disregard the findings below nor ignore…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Lee v. LeeSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1961
  2. Rountree v. IngleSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1913
  3. DuBose v. DuBoseSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1972
  4. Brown v. State Farm Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1980
  5. Saunders v. Phelps Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1898

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Strickland v. StricklandSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2007
  2. Hooper v. RockwellSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1999
  3. Wooten v. WootenSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2005
  4. Ackerman v. Travelers Indemnity Co.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1995
  5. Hughes v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2006

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API