Legal Opinion

Strickland v. Strickland

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided August 27, 2007No. 26375PublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Toal

This case began as an action to enforce an alimony award. The family court dismissed the claim finding it was barred by the doctrine of laches. We affirm, but modify the family court’s decision and we additionally vacate a portion of the family court’s decision.

Factual/Procedural Background

Upon the parties’ divorce in April 1988, the family court awarded $1200 per month in permanent periodic alimony to Appellant/Respondent Carol Strickland (“Wife”) to be paid by Respondent/Appellant Krom Strickland (“Husband”). This monthly total was increased by $200 in November 1990 after the family court…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Janasik v. Fairway Oaks Villas Horizontal Property RegimeSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1992
  2. Hallums v. HallumsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1988
  3. Cherry v. ThomassonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1981
  4. Boyd v. BellSouth Telephone Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2006
  5. Wooten v. WootenSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2005

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. Transportation Insurance v. South Carolina Second Injury FundSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2010
  2. Historic Charleston Holdings, LLC v. MallonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2009
  3. Earthscapes Unlimited, Inc. v. UlbrichSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2010
  4. Wilson v. WillisSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2019
  5. Eason v. EasonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2009

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API