Legal Opinion

Wooten v. Wooten

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided June 6, 2005No. 25977PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

Respondent/Petitioner (Wife) filed a petition for rehearing in which she asked the Court to clarify whether it intended to reverse the Court of Appeals’ remand of the issue of the alimony award to then family court. Petitioner/Respondent (Husband) filed a return in opposition.

We grant the petition for rehearing, withdraw the former opinion, and substitute the attached opinion.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/ Jean H. Toal, C.J. s/ James E. Moore, J. s/ John H. Waller, Jr., J. s/ E.C. Burnett, III, J. s/ Costa M. Pleicones, J. Justice BURNETT:

This divorce case raises issues related to equitable…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Berkebile v. OutenSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1993
  2. Glasscock v. GlasscockSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1991
  3. Donahue v. DonahueSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1989
  4. Cherry v. ThomassonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1981
  5. Mitchell v. MitchellSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1984

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Strickland v. StricklandSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2007
  2. Eason v. EasonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2009
  3. Clearwater Trust v. BuntingSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2006
  4. Drayton v. DraytonSupreme Court of The Virgin Islands · 2016
  5. Ables v. GladdenSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2008

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API