Rountree v. Ingle
Supreme Court of South Carolina
Before Sease, J., Union, Summer term, 1912. Action by T. J. Rountree against Ardella Ingle and W. F. Ingle, before J. Frost Walker, Jr., magistrate. Defendant appeals from judgment of Circuit Court. Cause of action is based on a lottery: Crim. Code 199; Mills 297; 14 Ency. 600, «02; 147 U. S. 449; 8 L. R. A. 671; 69 L. R. A. 505; 19 Ency. 598. No proof of cause of detention: 88 S. C. 429. No proof of demand: 89 S. C. 535; 1 McM. 428; 2 S'trob.
Read the full summary
Before Sease, J., Union, Summer term, 1912. Action by T. J. Rountree against Ardella Ingle and W. F. Ingle, before J. Frost Walker, Jr., magistrate. Defendant appeals from judgment of Circuit Court. Cause of action is based on a lottery: Crim. Code 199; Mills 297; 14 Ency. 600, «02; 147 U. S. 449; 8 L. R. A. 671; 69 L. R. A. 505; 19 Ency. 598. No proof of cause of detention: 88 S. C. 429. No proof of demand: 89 S. C. 535; 1 McM. 428; 2 S'trob. Eq. 370; 11 Rich. 267; 45 S. C. 388; 48 S. C. 421; 60 S. C. 103. This action is not based on a lottery: 2 Mill 128; 1 Bail. 315; 45 S. C. 372; 3 Dess.…
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the Court was delivered by
Mr. Justice Woods.
Sometime in 1911, Bailey Furniture and Lumber Company, of the city of Union, issued the following printed circular: “An elegant range free. In order to advertise their high grade stoves and ranges the Crescent Stove Works oí Evansville, Ind., are furnishing us this $65 rang-e free to give away to' our customers. It will not cost the one who gets it a brownie. * * * trade with us, and in addition to' getting more and better goods for the money, we give you a numbered card, a duplicate oí which is placed in a box from which a number…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Railroad Co. v. DurantSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- Packard & Field v. ByrdSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1905
- Lemon v. GrosskopfWisconsin Supreme Court · 1868
- Becker v. WilcoxNebraska Supreme Court · 1908
- Tate, Muller & Wittichen v. PeguesSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1888
3Cited by15 opinions
- Maughs v. PorterSupreme Court of Virginia · 1931
- Cherry v. ThomassonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1981
- Jackson v. Bi-Lo Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1993
- Johnson v. Collins Entertainment Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1998
- Griste v. BurchSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1919
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.