Legal Opinion

Ackerman v. Travelers Indemnity Co.

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Decided February 27, 1995No. 2308PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Per curiam

Respondents, Norman D. Ackerman, Jr. and Jo Ann Ackerman (Ackermans), brought this suit for declaratory judgment and reformation of an automobile insurance policy against appellant, Travelers Indemnity Company (Travelers). The Ackermans asked the court to reform the policy to include under-insured motorist coverage up to the liability limits of the policy as a remedy for Travelers’ alleged failure to comply with S.C. Code of Laws § 38-77-160 (1976 as amended). This statute requires automobile insurance carriers to offer their insureds optional underinsured motorist coverage up to the limits…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. C.A.N. Enterprises, Inc. v. South Carolina Health & Human Services Finance CommissionSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1988
  2. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Wannamaker Ex Rel. Estate of WannamakerSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1987
  3. Hastings v. United Pacific Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
  4. Garris v. Cincinnati InsuranceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1984
  5. Cherry v. ThomassonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1981

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Cobb v. BenjaminCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1997
  2. Ecclesiastes Production Ministries v. Outparcel Associates, LLCCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2007
  3. Wade v. Berkeley CountySupreme Court of South Carolina · 2002
  4. Smith v. South Carolina InsuranceCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2002
  5. McDonald Ex Rel. Estate of McDonald v. South Carolina Farm Bureau InsuranceCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1999

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API