Legal Opinion
Blair v. TA-Seattle East 176
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided June 29, 2009No. 62033-9-IPublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
210 P.3d 326 (2009)
Maureen T. BLAIR and Kenneth E. Blair, Appellants,
v.
TA-SEATTLE EAST # 176, dba Travelcenters of America, Respondent, and
Oak Hill Capital Management, Inc., Defendant.
No. 62033-9-I.
Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 1.
June 29, 2009.
Todd S. Richardson, Clarkston, WA, for Appellants.
Rodney L. Umberger Jr., Daniel W. Ferm, Williams Kastner & Gibbs, Seattle, WA, for Respondent.
GROSSE, J.
¶ 1 A trial court has the authority to strike a party's witnesses as a sanction where there is a showing of intentional or tactical nondisclosure, willful violation of a court order, or…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Washington State Physicians Insurance Exchange & Ass'n v. Fisons Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 1993
- Mayer v. Sto Industries, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2006
- Mayer v. Sto Industries, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2006
- Burnet v. Spokane AmbulanceWashington Supreme Court · 1997
- Hutchins v. 1001 Fourth Avenue AssociatesWashington Supreme Court · 1991
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Jones v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 2013
- Blair v. TA-Seattle East No. 176Washington Supreme Court · 2011
- Blair v. TA-Seattle East No. 176Washington Supreme Court · 2011
- Foss Maritime Co. v. BrandewiedeCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2015
- Foss Maritime Company, Res. v. Jeff Brandewiede, Jane Doe Brandewiede, App.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2015
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.