Legal Opinion

Thompson v. Chicago Great Western Railroad

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided October 23, 1925No. 24,785PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStone, J.

Action for personal injuries wherein there was a verdict for plaintiff. Defendant appeals from the order denying its alternative motion for judgment or a new trial.

Plaintiff is a section hand anld sustained injuries while assisting in repairing track after a wreck. He was pulling spikes with a clawbar which, according to his story, was defective in that the claws were flattened and had too much spread-Ahe says a quarter of an inch too much — the result being that it slipped from the head of a spike thereby precipitating him to the ground, Ms hand being caught between the heavy bar and' a…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Koschman v. AshSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1906
  2. Anderson v. Fred Johnson Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1911
  3. Kromer v. Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste. Marie Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1918
  4. Mollock v. Great Northern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1925

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Hedicke v. Highland Springs Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1931
  2. Jackson v. Chicago Great Western RailroadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1925
  3. Leyser v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific RailroadLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1954
  4. Natalino v. St. Paul Bridge & Terminal Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API