Legal Opinion

Anderson v. Fred Johnson Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided November 10, 1911No. Nos. 17,367—(38)PublishedCited by 14 opinions

Action in tbe district court for Olay county to recover $2,000 for personal injuries. Tbe answer to tbe amended complaint was a general denial. The case was tried before Johnson, J., and a jury which returned a verdict in favor of plaintiff for $1,200. Erom an order denying defendant’s alternative motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict or for a new trial, it appealed.

1Opinion of the CourtSimpson, J.

This is an appeal from an order denying defendant’s alternative motions for judgment notwithstanding the verdict or for a new trial.

Plaintiff had a verdict for $1,200 for personal injuries sustained under the following circumstances: The defendant had the contract for painting and finishing a building. Plaintiff, a man twenty-two years of age, an experienced painter, was in defendant’s employ. Plaintiff and another employee, in order to paint a porch ceiling, erected a scaffold by resting a plank on two stepladders placed twelve *57or fifteen feet apart. The defendant had for nse in the work…

2Cited by14 opinions

  1. Bothwell v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1913
  2. Walimaa v. MakiSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1925
  3. Hedicke v. Highland Springs Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1931
  4. Mozey v. EricksonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1931
  5. O'Brien v. Northwestern Consolidated Milling Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1912

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API