Legal Opinion

Natalino v. St. Paul Bridge & Terminal Railway Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided November 10, 1933No. 29,583PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OLSEN, Justice.

Appeal by plaintiff from an order setting aside the verdict in his favor and ordering judgment in favor of defendant. The action is one to recover damages for personal injury.

Plaintiff was in the employ of defendant as'a section man or track man on its railway tracks and yards at and near South St. Paul. On March 15, 1932, a crew of three men, consisting of plaintiff and one other section man and the section foreman or boss, were engaged in taking up the rails on one of defendant’s side tracks for the purpose of moving the rails to make a wider gauge. Tools for this purpose…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Koschman v. AshSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1906
  2. Hedicke v. Highland Springs Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1931
  3. Kromer v. Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste. Marie Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1918
  4. Vant Hul v. Great Northern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1903
  5. Morris v. Eastern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1902

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Cayse v. Foley Brothers, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1959
  2. Natalino v. St. Paul Bridge & Terminal Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API