Hunter v. Commissioner of Correction

Opinion

ZARELLA, J.

In this appeal,1 the court is required to determine whether the petitioner, Keith Hunter, is entitled by General Statutes § 18-98d,2 to have each of his two concurrent sentences, which were imposed on different dates, reduced by the same calendar days of presentence confinement credit, which he had accrued while held in lieu of bond under four separate dockets. We conclude that presentence confinement days credited to the petitioner’s initial sentence may not be credited to a subsequent concurrent sentence imposed on *858a different date. Accordingly, we reverse the judgment of…