Cox v. Commissioner of Correction
Supreme Court of Connecticut
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
ZARELLA, J.
This is one of three separate appeals 1 presently before this court in which the principal issue is whether the petitioner is entitled by General Statutes § 18-98d 2 to have each of his concurrent sentences, which were imposed on different dates, reduced by the same calendar days of presentence confinement credit, which he had accrued simultaneously while held in lieu of bond on two separate dockets. We conclude that presentence confinement days credited to the petitioner’s original sentence may not be credited to a subsequent concurrent sentence imposed on a different date.…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Horton v. MeskillSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1977
- Harris v. Commissioner of CorrectionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
- Tyson v. Commissioner of CorrectionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2002
- Tyson v. Armstrong, Commissioner, Connecticut Department of CorrectionSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
- Hunter v. Commissioner of CorrectionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
3Cited by11 opinions
- Orcutt v. Commissioner of CorrectionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
- Washington v. Commissioner of CorrectionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2008
- Hunter v. Commissioner of CorrectionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
- Whitaker v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2005
- Borrelli v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2009
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.