Legal Opinion

Cox v. Commissioner of Correction

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided November 30, 2004No. SC 17114PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

ZARELLA, J.

This is one of three separate appeals 1 presently before this court in which the principal issue is whether the petitioner is entitled by General Statutes § 18-98d 2 to have each of his concurrent sentences, which were imposed on different dates, reduced by the same calendar days of presentence confinement credit, which he had accrued simultaneously while held in lieu of bond on two separate dockets. We conclude that presentence confinement days credited to the petitioner’s original sentence may not be credited to a subsequent concurrent sentence imposed on a different date.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Horton v. MeskillSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1977
  2. Harris v. Commissioner of CorrectionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
  3. Tyson v. Commissioner of CorrectionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2002
  4. Tyson v. Armstrong, Commissioner, Connecticut Department of CorrectionSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
  5. Hunter v. Commissioner of CorrectionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Orcutt v. Commissioner of CorrectionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
  2. Washington v. Commissioner of CorrectionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2008
  3. Hunter v. Commissioner of CorrectionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
  4. Whitaker v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2005
  5. Borrelli v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2009

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API