Washington v. Commissioner of Correction
Supreme Court of Connecticut
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
ZARELLA, J.
The central issue raised in this appeal is whether the interpretation of General Statutes § 18-98d, first announced in a trilogy of cases in 2004, can be applied retroactively to prisoners in custody as of the date of that decision without offending their constitutional or statutory rights. See Hunter v. Commissioner of Correction, 271 Conn. 856, 860 A.2d 700 (2004); Cox v. Commissioner of Correction, 271 Conn. 844, 860 A.2d 708 (2004); Harris v. Commissioner of Correction, 271 Conn. 808, 860 A.2d 715 (2004). In Harris, we concluded that when a defendant is sentenced for…
2Cases cited61 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Hill v. LockhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Weaver v. GrahamSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Bouie v. City of ColumbiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Rivers v. Roadway Express, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1994
56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by44 opinions
- State v. CourchesneSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2010
- Crawford v. Commissioner of CorrectionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2009
- Johnson v. Commissioner of CorrectionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2008
- Taylor v. Commissioner of CorrectionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2017
- Ham v. Commissioner of CorrectionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2011
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.