Legal Opinion
Weisfeld v. Superior Court
California Court of Appeal
Decided March 28, 1952No. Civ. 18918PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
VALLÉE, J.
Petitioner seeks a writ of prohibition to restrain the Superior Court of the County of Los Angeles from taking any further proceedings in an action entitled “Harriet Tasoff and Lloyd A. Tasoff v. H. Daniel Weisfeld,” No. 579348, until H. Daniel Weisfeld, the defendant in that action, has been served with process in the manner prescribed by law.
Harriet Tasoff and Lloyd A. Tasoff, at all pertinent times, have resided in Los Angeles. On October 27, 1950, they commenced action 579348 against petitioner Weisfeld to recover damages for personal injuries and caused a summons to be issued.…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Akley v. BassettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
- Briggs v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
- Frey & Horgan Corp. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
- Pinon v. PollardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1945
- Northwestern Mortgage & Security Co. v. Noel Construction Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1941
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Bank of America v. CarrCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
- Bucholz v. HuttonDistrict Court, D. Montana · 1957
- Stamps v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
- Hicks v. HamiltonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1955
- Bakersfield Hacienda, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.