Legal Opinion
Frey & Horgan Corp. v. Superior Court
California Supreme Court
Decided February 26, 1936No. S. F. 15485PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtConrey, J.
Petition for writ of prohibition commanding the respondents to desist and refrain from further proceedings in an application in the respondent court for an order directing arbitration. In answer to the first question stated by the petitioner it should be said that an order of the superior court denying a motion to quash service of process may be reviewed on writ of prohibition. (Jardine v. Superior Court, 213 Cal. 301, 304 [2 Pac. (2d) 756, 79 A. L. R. 291].)
El Dorado Oil Works, a California corporation, filed its petition in the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco under…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Pennoyer v. NeffSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Jardine v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
- Mitsubishi Goshi Kaisha v. Carstens Packing Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1921
- Sturges & Burn Manufacturing Co. v. Unit Construction Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1917
3Cited by25 opinions
- Engalla v. Permanente Medical Group, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1997
- Watts v. CrawfordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
- Thornton v. RhodenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
- Lesser Towers, Inc. v. Roscoe-Ajax Construction Co.California Court of Appeal · 1969
- Eclipse Fuel Engineering Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.