Legal Opinion

Rice Lake Contracting, Inc. v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided April 7, 1995No. 90-352CPublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HORN, Judge.

This case comes before the court on the defendant’s motion for summary judgment, pursuant to Rule 56 of the Rules of the United States Court of Federal Claims (RUSCFC).1 Plaintiff, Rice Lake Contracting, Inc. (“Rice Lake”) filed this action challenging a final decision of the contracting officer, which denied three out of four .of the plaintiffs claims for an equitable adjustment to a service contract with the United States Air Force, and sustained plaintiffs claim for $3,759.20 for “additional footages.” The contract at issue was entered into for the purposes of the…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
  5. H.F. Allen Orchards, Elbert B. Schinmann, R.E. Redman & Sons, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Metcalf Construction Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2002
  2. Schweiger Construction Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2001
  3. Blinderman Construction Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1997
  4. International Data Products Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2005
  5. In Re Anchor Glass Container Corp.United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida · 2003

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API