Legal Opinion

Paone v. Dean Witter Reynolds, Inc.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 7, 2001PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTodd, J.

¶ 1 Dean Witter Reynolds, Inc. (“Dean Witter”)1 appeals the order denying its petition to compel arbitration in this suit brought against it by Joseph R. Paone. We are called upon in this appeal to determine whether the rule articulated by our Supreme Court in Flightways Corp. v. Keystone Helicopter Corp., 459 Pa. 660, 331 A.2d 184 (1975) — that an arbitration provision is enforceable in an agreement alleged to have been induced by fraud unless the allegation of fraud goes specifically to the arbitration provision — applies where the agreement is alleged to have arisen out of a confidential…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Frowen v. BlankSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  2. Flightways Corp. v. Keystone Helicopter Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  3. Ambridge Borough Water Authority v. ColumbiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  4. Smith v. Cumberland Group, Ltd.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
  5. Merritt-Chapman & Scott Corporation v. Pennsylvania Turnpike CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1967

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Wisniski v. Brown & Brown Ins. Co. of PASuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
  2. Ross Development Co. v. Advanced Building Development, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  3. Fastuca v. L.W. Molnar & AssociatesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
  4. Yenchi v. Ameriprise Financial, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
  5. FDA Packaging Inc. v. Advance Personnel Staffing Inc., Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Berks County2005

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API