Legal Opinion

Ambridge Borough Water Authority v. Columbia

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 20, 1974No. Appeal, No. 115PublishedCited by 94 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Nix,

The single question to be decided in this appeal is whether the dispute which has presently arisen between the parties to an employment contract should be resolved through arbitration pursuant to paragraph 17 of that employment agreement. After full consideration, we are of the view that the controversy should be resolved as provided by the parties in paragraph 17 of their agreement and therefore affirm the decision of the trial court.

The Borough of Ambridge Water Authority commenced an action in equity requesting that the court declare an employment contract between…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Washington Arbitration CaseSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1969
  2. National Grange Mutual Insurance v. KuhnSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
  3. Allstate Insurance v. TaylorSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1969
  4. Mendelson v. ShragerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
  5. Harleysville Mutual Insurance v. MedyckiSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1968

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by94 opinions

  1. Gavlik Construction Co. v. H. F. Campbell Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1975
  2. Flightways Corp. v. Keystone Helicopter Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  3. Maryland-National Capital Park & Planning Commission v. Washington National ArenaCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1978
  4. Taylor v. Extendicare Health Facilities, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
  5. Smith v. Cumberland Group, Ltd.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1997

89 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API