Legal Opinion

Wisniski v. Brown & Brown Ins. Co. of PA

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided August 15, 2006No. 797 MDA 2003, 876 MDA 2003PublishedCited by 51 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

LALLY-GREEN, J.:

¶ 1 This case is on remand from our Supreme Court. We must consider whether insurance brokers have a duty to inspect a business property for purposes of offering flood insurance, using the framework set forth in Althaus v. Cohen, 562 Pa. 547, 756 A.2d 1166 (2000). Using that framework, we conclude that no such duty exists. We therefore affirm the trial court’s grant of summary judgment.

¶ 2 This case initially arose as an appeal by Plaintiffs/Appellants, Mark and Elizabeth Wisniski, Vd/b/a Saturn Surplus (“Saturn Surplus”), from the trial court’s order dated April 18,…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Etoll, Inc. v. Elias/Savion Advertising, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  2. Althaus Ex Rel. Althaus v. CohenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
  3. Atcovitz v. Gulph Mills Tennis Club, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  4. Phillips v. Cricket LightersSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  5. R.W. v. ManzekSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2005

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by51 opinions

  1. Yenchi, E. v. Ameriprise Financial, Aplts.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
  2. Commerce Bank/Pennsylvania v. First Union National BankSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
  3. Dixon, J. v. Northwestern MutualSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
  4. Kelly, R. v. The Carman Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2020
  5. Dibish v. Ameriprise Financial, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2016

46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API