Legal Opinion
Flightways Corp. v. Keystone Helicopter Corp.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Decided January 27, 1975No. 209PublishedCited by 123 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
POMEROY, Justice.
The parties to this litigation are also parties to an agreement relative to the. furnishing of helicopter shuttle and charter services. The contract includes an arbitration clause, which is as follows:
“Any controversy or claim arising out of or relating to this Agreement, or the alleged breach thereof, except where other relief is more appropriate in connection with a breach of Section VIII hereof [not here applicable], shall be settled by arbitration in Philadelphia in accordance with the Rules of the American Arbitration Association, and judgment upon…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Prima Paint Corp. v. Flood & Conklin Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Ambridge Borough Water Authority v. ColumbiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
- Merritt-Chapman & Scott Corporation v. Pennsylvania Turnpike CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1967
- Emmaus Municipal Authority v. EltzSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1964
- Goldstein v. Int. L. G. W. U.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by123 opinions
- Gavlik Construction Co. v. H. F. Campbell Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1975
- Parker v. Children's Hospital of Phila.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
- Smith v. Cumberland Group, Ltd.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
- Midomo Co. v. Presbyterian Housing Development Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
- Raymond J. Battaglia, Sr. v. Mary Ann McKendry Mary Anne Battaglia James Doorcheck, Inc. Raymond Battaglia, Jr. James Battaglia American Arbitration Association Timothy B. Barnard, EsqCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2000
118 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.