Fastuca v. L.W. Molnar & Associates
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION BY BENDER, J.:
¶ 1 Louis W. Molnar, Jr. and Mary Lou Molnar, individually and trading and doing business as L.W. Molnar & Associates, and L.W. Molnar & Associates (the Molnars) appeal the trial court’s order terminating common law arbitration of claims raised in the underlying civil action by Diane L. Fastuca. The Molnars contend that the trial court abused its discretion in attempting to terminate the arbitration or alter the findings of the arbitrator prior to entry of a final award. We concur in the Mol-nars’ assessment of the trial court’s ruling. Accordingly, we reverse the…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Flightways Corp. v. Keystone Helicopter Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
- Ross Development Co. v. Advanced Building Development, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
- Girard Bank v. HALEYSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
- Sage v. GreenspanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
- McKenna v. SossoSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Fastuca v. L.W. Molnar & AssociatesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
- Commonwealth Ex Rel. Kane v. Philip Morris, Inc.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
- TTSP Corp. v. The Rose Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2019
- Chilutti, S. v. Uber Technologies, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2023
- Chilutti, S. v. Uber Technologies, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2022
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.