People v. Abraham
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtMcCOMB, J.
From a judgment of guilty of violating section 337a, subdivision 3, of the Penal Code after trial before the court without a jury, defendant appeals. There is also an appeal from the order denying defendant’s motion for a new trial.
The evidence being viewed in the light most favorable to the People (respondent) the essential facts are:
Officer Stewart Jones stated that he saw defendant on or about September 22, 1941, on the sidewalk between Broadway and Hill on Fifth Street in the city of Los Angeles; that he, Officer Jones, in company with Officer Allen had driven around the block several…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- People v. NewlandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
- People v. KahnCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938
3Cited by4 opinions
- People v. BatemanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
- People v. MangiameliCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
- People v. AbramsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
- People v. BatemanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943