Legal Opinion

People v. Abraham

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 24, 1942No. Crim. No. 3573PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcCOMB, J.

From a judgment of guilty of violating section 337a, subdivision 3, of the Penal Code after trial before the court without a jury, defendant appeals. There is also an appeal from the order denying defendant’s motion for a new trial.

The evidence being viewed in the light most favorable to the People (respondent) the essential facts are:

Officer Stewart Jones stated that he saw defendant on or about September 22, 1941, on the sidewalk between Broadway and Hill on Fifth Street in the city of Los Angeles; that he, Officer Jones, in company with Officer Allen had driven around the block several…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. People v. NewlandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
  2. People v. KahnCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. People v. BatemanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
  2. People v. MangiameliCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
  3. People v. AbramsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
  4. People v. BatemanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API