Legal Opinion

People v. Abrams

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 13, 1943No. Crim. No. 3669PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcCOMB, J.

From a judgment of guilty of violating section 337a, subdivision 1, of the Penal Code, after trial before the court without a jury, defendant appeals. There is also an appeal from the order denying defendant’s motion for a new trial.

The evidence being viewed in the light most favorable to the People (respondent), the essential facts are:

July 24, 1942, police officers of the Los Angeles Police Department entered a cocktail bar of the Ritz Hotel in Los Angeles. In an adjacent hallway near a telephone booth they observed several persons, among whom was defendant, reading scratch sheets and…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. People v. NewlandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
  2. People v. StaplesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906
  3. People v. PianezziCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940
  4. People v. LamsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1934
  5. People v. BatemanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. People v. ClarkCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1945
  2. People v. VicencioCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1945
  3. State v. JacobsNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API