People v. Abrams
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtMcCOMB, J.
From a judgment of guilty of violating section 337a, subdivision 1, of the Penal Code, after trial before the court without a jury, defendant appeals. There is also an appeal from the order denying defendant’s motion for a new trial.
The evidence being viewed in the light most favorable to the People (respondent), the essential facts are:
July 24, 1942, police officers of the Los Angeles Police Department entered a cocktail bar of the Ritz Hotel in Los Angeles. In an adjacent hallway near a telephone booth they observed several persons, among whom was defendant, reading scratch sheets and…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- People v. NewlandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
- People v. StaplesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906
- People v. PianezziCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940
- People v. LamsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1934
- People v. BatemanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- People v. ClarkCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1945
- People v. VicencioCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1945
- State v. JacobsNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2000