Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

People v. Mangiameli

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 1, 1957No. Crim. 5808PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWhite, P. J.

In an information filed by the district attorney of Los Angeles County, defendant was charged with three violations of section 337a of the Penal Code. We are here concerned only with Count II in which a conviction resulted and by which defendant was accused of a violation of subdivision 3 of the foregoing Penal Code section, in that he did “. . . receive, hold, . . . certain moneys . . . staked, pledged, bet and wagered . . . upon the result of a trial . . . and contest of speed . . . between beasts, to wit, horses.” From the judgment of conviction and the order denying his motion for a new…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. People v. NewlandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
  2. People v. BatemanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
  3. People v. TompkinsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
  4. People v. KahnCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938
  5. People v. AbrahamCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. People v. LintCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
  2. People v. CastroCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
  3. People v. MeachamCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
  4. People v. WeisbergCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
  5. People v. HutchinsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API