Legal Opinion

People v. Bateman

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 9, 1943No. Crim. 3662Published

1Opinion of the Court

57 Cal.App.2d 585 (1943)

THE PEOPLE, Respondent,

v.

BENJAMIN BATEMAN, Appellant.

Crim. No. 3662.

California Court of Appeals. Second Dist., Div. Two.

Mar. 9, 1943.

Philip S. Schutz for Appellant.

Earl Warren, Attorney General, and Eugene M. Elson, Deputy Attorney General, for Respondent.

McCOMB, J.

From judgments of guilty of violating section 337a, subdivision 3 of the Penal Code, after trial before the court without a jury, defendant appeals. There is also an appeal from the order denying defendant's motion for a new trial.

The evidence being viewed in the light most favorable to the People…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. People v. NewlandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
  2. Asher v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
  3. People v. HinkleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1923
  4. People v. PruittCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
  5. People v. DavisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API