Legal Opinion

Daboll v. Moon

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided July 13, 1914PublishedCited by 18 opinions

Suit to determine the validity and construction of the will of John Moon of New London, deceased, brought to and reserved by the Superior Court in New London County, Reed, J., upon the facts stated in the complaint, for the advice of this court.

1Opinion of the CourtThayer, J.

The plaintiff is administrator d. b. n. with the will annexed of the estate of John Moon, who died in 1898, leaving real and personal estate and three sons, John H. Moon, Jesse A. Moon and Willard B. Moon. One- half of the testator’s estate is given by the will to Jesse A. Moon upon a condition relating to the son John H., which is now unimportant, as the latter died in 1899. The other half of the estate was disposed of by the following provisions of the will: “Upon the death of the present wife of said Willard B. Moon, or if he shall obtain a divorce from her or shall become separated from…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Dennis v. DennisSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1896
  2. Gould v. GouldSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1905
  3. Wolfe v. HathewaySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1908
  4. Coe v. HillMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1909
  5. Conrad v. LongMichigan Supreme Court · 1875

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. In Re Proving the Will of SeamanNew York Court of Appeals · 1916
  2. Graves v. First National Bank in Grand ForksNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1965
  3. Williams v. HundSupreme Court of Missouri · 1924
  4. State v. WymanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1934
  5. Baker v. HickmanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1929

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API