Coe v. Hill
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Bill in equity, called a petition, filed in the Probate Court for the county of Middlesex on April 16, 1908, by Oscalena Arville Coe, of Bognor in the county of Sussex in England, wife of Frank Ernest Coe of Hampstead in the county of Middlesex in England, praying for the appointment of a guardian ad litem for the four minor children of the plaintiff and her said husband and for the termination of a trust for the benefit of the plaintiff created by the will of Timothy E.…
Read the full summary
Bill in equity, called a petition, filed in the Probate Court for the county of Middlesex on April 16, 1908, by Oscalena Arville Coe, of Bognor in the county of Sussex in England, wife of Frank Ernest Coe of Hampstead in the county of Middlesex in England, praying for the appointment of a guardian ad litem for the four minor children of the plaintiff and her said husband and for the termination of a trust for the benefit of the plaintiff created by the will of Timothy E. Stuart, late of Newton in this Commonwealth, the father of the plaintiff. In the Probate Court Lawton, J., made a decree…
1Opinion of the CourtBraley, J.
By the fifth clause of his will, after having given and devised to his son Ronald and to his daughter Velnah each two undivided sevenths free from any trust, Timothy E. Stuart devised and bequeathed the remaining three sevenths of the rest, and residue of his estate in trust, “to hold, manage, invest and care for in a prudent and careful manner and to collect all the income therefrom and pay all proper and legal expenses thereon and pay the net income of two thirds of said three sevenths (or two sevenths of said ‘ rest and residue ’) to my said wife Sarah for and during her life at such…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Maynard v. HillSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
- In Re GrimleySupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- Livingston v. . LivingstonNew York Court of Appeals · 1903
- Randall v. KreigerSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
- Nolin v. PearsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1906
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Richards v. RichardsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1930
- Haile v. HaleSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
- Daboll v. MoonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1914
- Graves v. First National Bank in Grand ForksNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1965
- Campbell v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1950
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.