Legal Opinion
State v. Wyman
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided June 8, 1934PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHaines, J.
This accused was charged under General Statutes § 6277, the relevant portions of which provide: “Any man who shall carnally know any female under the age of forty-five years who is epileptic, imbecile, feeble-minded or a pauper shall be imprisoned,” etc. The information alleged that the “State’s Attorney for Fairfied County accuses Frank W. Wyman ... of the crime of carnal abuse of a feeble-minded person, and charges that between the first day of December, 1931, and the first day of Janu ary, 1932, . . . said Frank W. Wyman did carnally know one Margaret Casey, a female aged thirty-one years,…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- State v. SmithSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1881
- Gould v. GouldSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1905
- Commonwealth v. TueyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1851
- State v. MoscaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1916
- Schiesel v. S. Z. Poli Realty Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1928
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Tough v. IvesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1972
- State v. WaltersSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1958
- State v. O'NeilSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2002
- State v. RafanelloSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1964
- City of Cleburne v. Cleburne Living Center, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.