Legal Opinion

Conrad v. Long

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided November 2, 1875PublishedCited by 27 opinions

Error to Wayne Circuit.

1Opinion of the Court

Campbell, J:.Elizabeth Long sued Conrad in ejectment for the undivided half of certain lands in Wayne county. Her title, which depends on a devise, is the main matter in before us. It was claimed by Conrad to have been invalid upon its face.

Both parties claimed under the same source of title, which was the will of one A. S. Conrad. He devised the lands in question to his mother for life. After her death it was to go in conformity with the following clause of the will:

“To my brother Frederick S. Conrad I give and bequeath the one-half so remaining, and the other half I give and bequeath to my…

2Cited by27 opinions

  1. In re the Judicial Settlement of the Intermediate Account of HaightAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1900
  2. Coe v. HillMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1909
  3. Rivenett v. BourquinMichigan Supreme Court · 1884
  4. Born v. HorstmannCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
  5. Cowley v. TwomblyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1899

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API