Legal Opinion
Belz v. Peerless Insurance
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided September 2, 2014No. Civil Case No. 3:13-CV-01315 (JCH)PublishedCited by 34 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RULING RE: MOTION TO DISMISS (DOC. NO. 20)
JANET C. HALL, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
Plaintiffs Stephen and Karla Belz (the “Belzes”) bring this action against the issuer of their homeowner insurance policy, Peerless Insurance Company (“Peerless”), for its alleged refusal to pay for damage to the basement walls of the Belzes’ house according to the terms of their policy. The Belzes’ Complaint (Doc. No. 1) contains four counts against Peerless. The first count alleges that Peerless breached the homeowner insurance policy (the “Policy”) that it had issued to the Belzes. The second count…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Hemi Group, LLC v. City of New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
- Fulton v. GoordCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2009
- Mead v. BurnsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- Roberts v. Liberty Mutual Fire Insurance Co.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2017
- Tucker v. American International Group, Inc.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2016
- Courteau v. Teachers Insurance Co.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2017
- Hartford Roman Catholic Diocesan, Corp. v. Interstate Fire & Casualty Co.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2016
- Vasily v. Mony Life Insurance Co. of AmericaDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2015
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.