Legal Opinion
Flint v. Universal Machine Co.
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided August 6, 1996No. 15238PublishedCited by 46 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtNorcott, J.
The principal issue in this appeal is whether a “products-completed operations hazard” exclusion in a comprehensive general liability insurance policy relieves an insurer of its duty to defend where the complaint1 against the insured alleged injuries caused by the insured’s negligent repair of a machine press, but failed explicitly to allege that the defective work was “completed” for purposes of coverage. The third party plaintiff, Universal Machine Company (Universal), the insured and defendant in the underlying negligence action, appeals from the judgment of the trial court in favor of the…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Lee v. Aetna Casualty & Surety CoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1949
- Missionaries of the Co. of Mary, Inc. v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1967
- Smedley Co. v. Employers Mutual Liability Insurance Co. of WisconsinSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1956
- Aetna Life & Casualty Co. v. BulaongSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
- Oceanonics, Inc. v. Petroleum Distributing CompanySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1974
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by46 opinions
- Imperial Casualty & Indemnity Co. v. StateSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
- Hartford Casualty Insurance v. Litchfield Mutual Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2005
- Springdale Donuts, Inc. v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1999
- Moore v. Continental Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2000
- Mayor and City Council of Baltimore v. Utica Mutual Ins. Co.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2002
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.