Legal Opinion

Connecticut Insurance Guaranty Ass'n v. Fontaine

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided July 4, 2006No. SC 17457PublishedCited by 50 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

NORCOTT, J.

In this appeal, we consider whether the trial court properly concluded that a loss of consortium claim is covered under the terms of a professional liability insurance policy covering claims that arise “because of bodily injury.” The plaintiff, the Connecticut Insurance Guaranty Association (association), brought this declaratory judgment action to determine its obligation to pay a loss of consortium claim brought in connection with a medical malpractice action that had been commenced by the named defendant, Carol Fontaine, and her husband, Thomas Fontaine. The association…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Hopson v. St. Mary's HospitalSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1979
  2. Champagne v. Raybestos-Manhattan, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
  3. Worcester Insurance v. Fells Acres Day School, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1990
  4. Marri v. Stamford Street Railroad Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1911
  5. Izzo v. Colonial Penn InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by50 opinions

  1. Grady v. Town of SomersSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2009
  2. Perez-Dickson v. City of BridgeportSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2012
  3. Mazurek v. Great American InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
  4. Cogswell v. American Transit InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
  5. Potvin v. Lincoln Service & Equipment Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2010

45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API