Legal Opinion

Vermont Mutual Insurance v. Walukiewicz

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided March 17, 2009No. SC 18061PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

ROGERS, C. J.

The primary question raised by this appeal is whether provisions in the liability insurance portion of a homeowner’s insurance policy (policy) that afford indemnification for damages resulting from accidents, but not for intentionally caused injuries, preclude coverage for an insured who, when acting in self-defense, causes bodily injury to another. The plaintiff, Vermont Mutual Insurance Company, brought this declaratory judgment action 1 to obtain a determination of whether it was obligated to defend or indemnify its insured, the named defendant, Joseph S. Walukiewicz,…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Transamerica Insurance Group v. MeereArizona Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Grange Insurance Co. v. BrosseauWashington Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Home Insurance Company v. NeilsenIndiana Court of Appeals · 1975
  4. Allstate Insurance v. NovakNebraska Supreme Court · 1981
  5. Preferred Mutual Insurance v. ThompsonOhio Supreme Court · 1986

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. Belz v. Peerless InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2014
  2. New London County Mutual Insurance Co. v. NantesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2012
  3. Nationwide Mutual Ins. Co. v. PasiakSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2017
  4. Hartford Roman Catholic Diocesan Corp. v. Interstate Fire & Cas. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2018
  5. General Refractories Co. v. First State InsuranceDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2015

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API