Legal Opinion

Galassi Mosaic & Tile Co. v. City of Boston

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided October 28, 1936PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPierce, J.

This is an action of tort. The declaration alleges, in substance, that the plaintiff, a duly organized corporation, is engaged in the manufacture and sale of mosaic and tile; that by St. 1929, c. 297, it was provided that the city of Boston should proceed with the laying out and construction of a tunnel, which should consist of two or more roadways or lanes for vehicular traffic, under Boston Harbor, between the city of Boston proper and the East Boston end thereof; that pursuant to said legislative requirements one Wilbur W. Davis, an engineer in the employ of the defendant, in its transit…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Dean v. CharltonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1869
  2. Nicolson Pavement Co. v. PainterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1868
  3. Simpson v. City of MarlboroughMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1920
  4. Jekshewitz v. GroswaldMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1929
  5. State Ex Rel. City of Stamford v. Board of Purchase & SuppliesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1930

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Morash & Sons, Inc. v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1973
  2. Phipps Products Corp. v. Massachusetts Bay Transportation AuthorityMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1982
  3. Sloper v. City of QuincyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1938
  4. Daddario v. City of PittsfieldMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1938
  5. Baumgardner v. City of BostonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1939

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API