Legal Opinion

Simpson v. City of Marlborough

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided June 23, 1920PublishedCited by 34 opinions

Contract for compensation for services as an architect alleged to have been rendered by the plaintiff to the defendant at the request and under agreement with duly authorized agents of the defendant, the declaration containing three counts, of which the third was upon an account annexed. Writ dated November 29, 1915. In the Superior Court the action was heard by Aiken, C. J., without a jury. Material evidence is described in the opinion.

Read the full summary

Contract for compensation for services as an architect alleged to have been rendered by the plaintiff to the defendant at the request and under agreement with duly authorized agents of the defendant, the declaration containing three counts, of which the third was upon an account annexed. Writ dated November 29, 1915. In the Superior Court the action was heard by Aiken, C. J., without a jury. Material evidence is described in the opinion. At the close of the evidence the defendant asked for the following rulings: “1. On all the evidence, a verdict should be ordered for the defendant. “2. Under…

1Opinion of the CourtRugg, C. J.

This is an action of contract to recover compensation for services rendered by the plaintiff in preparing plans and specifications for a school house, the erection of which in the defendant city was contemplated in 1915. The city council on June 7, 1915, passed an order for the appointment of a committee consisting of three members of the school committee, the mayor, two aldermen and three members of the common council, “invested with full authority to make contracts, purchase supplies and fittings and superintend the erection of a new school house” with “power to do any and all things…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Clarke v. City of Fall RiverMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1914
  2. McLean v. Mayor of HolyokeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1913
  3. Boston Electric Co. v. City of CambridgeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1895
  4. Higginson v. City of Fall RiverMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1917
  5. Vinal v. Inhabitants of NahantMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1919

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. Byfield v. City of NewtonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1923
  2. Leonard v. School Committee of the City of SpringfieldMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1922
  3. Ring v. City of WoburnMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1942
  4. Cullen v. Mayor of NewtonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1941
  5. Fluet v. McCabeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1938

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API