Legal Opinion
Daddario v. City of Pittsfield
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Decided December 8, 1938PublishedCited by 29 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDolan, J.
This is an action of contract which was brought in the Superior Court. The judge entered an order sustaining the defendant’s demurrer to the plaintiff’s “substitute declaration,” on grounds “1, 2a & 2b,” and reported his action for the determination of this court.
The material allegations of the plaintiff’s declaration may be summarized as follows: On or about December 20, 1935, the parties entered into a contract in writing by the terms of which the plaintiff undertook and agreed to make certain additions to the defendant’s “Sewage Treatment Plant.” While the contract is not set out in full…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Bolster v. City of LawrenceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1917
- Clarke v. City of Fall RiverMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1914
- Steffe v. Old Colony RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1892
- Cox v. SegeeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1910
- Deane v. Inhabitants of RandolphMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1882
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Singarella v. City of BostonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1961
- Commonwealth v. DoweMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1943
- Attorney General v. Trustees of Boston Elevated Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1946
- Ryder v. Town of LexingtonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1939
- Adie v. Mayor of HolyokeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1939
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.