Legal Opinion
Sloper v. City of Quincy
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Decided June 29, 1938PublishedCited by 36 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDolan, J.
This is an action of tort brought to recover compensation for personal injuries and damage to property. At the close of the evidence the defendant’s motion for *21a directed verdict was allowed, subject to the plaintiff’s exceptions. The case was reported to this court for determination, at the request of the parties, who stipulated that, in the event that the action of the judge in directing a verdict for the defendant was error, judgment is to be entered for the plaintiff in the sum of $400; otherwise, judgment is to be entered for the defendant. The plaintiff’s amended declaration is in six…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Hill v. City of BostonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1877
- Bolster v. City of LawrenceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1917
- Hand v. Inhabitants of BrooklineMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1879
- Pettingell v. City of ChelseaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1894
- Orlando v. City of BrocktonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1936
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- Morash & Sons, Inc. v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1973
- Kai Jakobsen v. Massachusetts Port AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1975
- Whalen v. Worcester Electric Light Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1940
- Adie v. Mayor of HolyokeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1939
- Baumgardner v. City of BostonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1939
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.