Legal Opinion

Jekshewitz v. Groswald

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided January 2, 1929PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSanderson, J.

This is an action of tort for deceit, in which the plaintiff alleges she was induced to live with the defendant as his wife by reason of his fraudulent representation that they were lawfully married. The defendant excepted to the refusal of the judge to direct a verdict in his favor.

The parties were born in Latvia, the defendant coming to this country in 1906, and the plaintiff in 1909. The jury could have found that they first met in February, 1911, and, *415after a courtship lasting a few months, mutually promised to marry; that he gave her a ring and they announced to their friends and…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Old Dominion Copper Mining & Smelting Co. v. BigelowMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1909
  2. Eaton v. EatonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1919
  3. Commonwealth v. MixerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1910
  4. Nowel v. Equitable Trust Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1924
  5. Kelley v. RileyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1871

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Cellucci v. Sun Oil Co.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1974
  2. Stetson v. FrenchMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1947
  3. Stark v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of United StatesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1939
  4. Alexander v. KuykendallSupreme Court of Virginia · 1951
  5. Connelly v. BartlettMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1934

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API