Clayton v. Schultz

MAXET, J., pro tem.

The pertinent facts of this case are fully set forth in a former appeal between these same parties, reported in 4 Cal. (2d) page 425 [50 Pac. (2d) 446], At that time the record was insufficient to properly determine the rights of the parties hereto under the tax sale proceeding. All of the other controverted questions are fully answered by the decision above referred to. The plaintiff in intervention, having succeeded to all the rights and liabilities of the original plaintiff, will be referred to herein as the plaintiff.

The sole and only question here presented is: “Were…